# Description

All binutils packages declare themselves to be under the GPL-2.0-or-later ('GPL' in the PKGBUILD). This is incorrect as all the binaries in these package identify their licenses as the GPL-3.0-or-later ('GPL3').

This is also incomplete for all these packages as
* all the documentation appears to be licensed under the GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later ('FDL1.3');
* and a bunch of script files in all the packages are licensed under an old version of the [FSF All Permissive License](https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html) without a warranty disclaimer.

So the proper array would be `license=('GPL3' 'FDL1.3' 'custom: FSFAP-no-warranty-disclaimer')`.

The affected packages are:

* aarch64-linux-gnu-binutils-2.36.1-1
* arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.36.1-2
* avr-binutils-2.36.1-2
* lm32-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* mingw-w64-binutils-2.36.1-1
* nds32le-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* or1k-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* ppc64le-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* riscv32-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* riscv64-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* riscv64-linux-gnu-binutils-2.36.1-1
* sh2-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2
* sh4-elf-binutils-2.36.1-2

The FSF All Permissive License can be extracted in `build()` like this:

```
# Extract the FSF All Permissive License
# <https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html>
# used for some linker scripts.
tail -n 5 ./ld/scripttempl/README > FSFAP-no-warranty-disclaimer
```

In `package()` it can then be installed like this:

```
install -Dm644 -t "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/" FSFAP-no-warranty-disclaimer
```

# Steps to reproduce

* Run all the binaries as `./binary --version` to confirm they are licensed under the GPL-3.0-or-later.
* Inspect man and info pages in `usr/share/{man,info}/` to confirm these are licensed under the GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later.
* Inspect anything in `usr/gnu_triplet/lib/ldscripts/` to verify they are licensed under the GNU All Permissive License.

The attached `collect.sh` takes the package archive as its sole argument, untars it, collects the relevant copyright statements to "$1.copyrights", and removes the unpacked `usr/` tree. Output for all the packages is attached to the bug report. Variations in structure mean that 'avr-binutils-2.36.1-2' and 'mingw-w64-binutils-2.36.1-1' require manual inspection of the package contents to confirm my claims.

# Additional information

binutils in core is [also affected](https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/71331), but the license array for that package should have more entries than here.