Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#70836 - [gc] License is not GPL
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jonas Hahnfeld (hahnjo) - Thursday, 13 May 2021, 14:10 GMT
Last edited by freswa (frederik) - Friday, 23 June 2023, 15:13 GMT
Opened by Jonas Hahnfeld (hahnjo) - Thursday, 13 May 2021, 14:10 GMT
Last edited by freswa (frederik) - Friday, 23 June 2023, 15:13 GMT
|
DetailsThe copyright notice at https://www.hboehm.info/gc/license.txt and the last section of README.md is closer to the MIT/X11 license.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by freswa (frederik)
Friday, 23 June 2023, 15:13 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 3e6485316dc515b67ef1dba66ad26ba4aae3c86f
Friday, 23 June 2023, 15:13 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 3e6485316dc515b67ef1dba66ad26ba4aae3c86f
Comment by Jonas Hahnfeld (hahnjo) -
Wednesday, 21 July 2021, 19:16 GMT
ping?
Comment by Anatol Pomozov (anatolik) -
Wednesday, 21 July 2021, 22:23 GMT
It looks like the project has a mix of licenses with some GPL files, isn't it?
Comment by Jonas Hahnfeld (hahnjo) -
Thursday, 22 July 2021, 06:40 GMT
It used to be that bdwgc required libatomic_ops, but since version 8.0 this is only needed if the compiler doesn't understand C atomics. Some build system files are GPL'd, but in my understanding the exceptions ensure that this does not imply the whole library is GPL.