Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#7080 - pacman -Su shows wrong packages versions.
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Michal Kubicki (mkubicki) - Sunday, 06 May 2007, 10:08 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Sunday, 06 May 2007, 11:55 GMT
Opened by Michal Kubicki (mkubicki) - Sunday, 06 May 2007, 10:08 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Sunday, 06 May 2007, 11:55 GMT
|
Details[root@hell ~]# pacman -Su
:: alsa-lib: local (1.0.14rc3-2) appears to be newer than repo (current/1.0.14rc3-1) :: esd: local (0.2.38-1) appears to be newer than repo (current/0.2.37-3) :: gcc: local (4.1.2-4) appears to be newer than repo (current/4.1.2-3) :: kernel26: local (2.6.21.1-7) appears to be newer than repo (current/2.6.20.10-1) :: klibc-udev: local (110-2) appears to be newer than repo (current/107-2) :: udev: local (110-3) appears to be newer than repo (current/107-3) :: Above packages will be skipped. To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S <pkg>' I do not use 'Unstable' branch. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Sunday, 06 May 2007, 11:00 GMT
I guess your mirror is outdated. Could be that you retrieved these updates from a different mirror than you're currently upgrading from.