Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#70540 - [wireguard-tools] remove wireguard-lts from optdepends
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by nl6720 (nl6720) - Thursday, 22 April 2021, 10:00 GMT
Last edited by Christian Hesse (eworm) - Thursday, 22 April 2021, 21:29 GMT
Opened by nl6720 (nl6720) - Thursday, 22 April 2021, 10:00 GMT
Last edited by Christian Hesse (eworm) - Thursday, 22 April 2021, 21:29 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
After linux-lts moved to 5.10, the wireguard-lts package was removed from the repos. wireguard-tools shouldn't list a non-existing package in optdepends. On the same note, now that nothing depends on it, maybe wireguard-dkms could be dumped to AUR. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. * link to upstream bug report, if any wireguard-tools 1.0.20210315-1 Steps to reproduce: $ pacman -Qi wireguard-tools |
This task depends upon
Closed by Christian Hesse (eworm)
Thursday, 22 April 2021, 21:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: wireguard-tools 1.0.20210315-2
Thursday, 22 April 2021, 21:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: wireguard-tools 1.0.20210315-2
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) -
Thursday, 22 April 2021, 11:21 GMT
- Field changed: Status (Unconfirmed → Assigned)
- Task assigned to Christian Hesse (eworm)
Anyway, isn't this why the "WIREGUARD_MODULE" provides exists?