Pacman

Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.

The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues

This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
Tasklist

FS#7048 - pacman 3.0.3-1 server troubles

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Brian Propp (darweth) - Tuesday, 01 May 2007, 23:48 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Monday, 28 May 2007, 23:24 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category General
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version 3.0.3
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

phrakture requested a bug report be filled for this error.

"Can you please post this to the bug tracker. If I'm reading funkyou's post correctly, it appears this may be the web server rejecting the Range header. As such this could be fixed in libdownload.

Additionally, can you check if you have a "kdemod.db.tar.gz.part" file in /var/cache/pacman or /var/lib/pacman somewhere? This might possibly be due to the fact that there is a .part file with a size differing from what is on the server. This also might be able to be fixed in pacman."

the .part file DID exist in /var/lib/pacman
------
:: Synchronizing package databases...
current is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
unstable is up to date
error: failed retrieving file 'kdemod.db.tar.gz' from funkyou.hinterhof-hosting.de : Requested Range Not Satisfiable
error: failed to synchronize kdemod: Requested Range Not Satisfiable
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: pacman: local (3.0.3-1) is newer than current (2.9.8-4)
local database is up to date
This task depends upon

Closed by  Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Monday, 28 May 2007, 23:24 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 03:23 GMT
You say the .part file existed. Does deleting it help?
Comment by eliott (cactus) - Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 03:24 GMT
forum link, for completeness: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=32527
Comment by Brian Propp (darweth) - Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 03:27 GMT
I just deleted the .part file. All is working now. Repository working normally. :)

Loading...