Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#7009 - Eaccelerator: patch for cache problem against 0.9.5
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Roberto Braga (Bobonov) - Thursday, 26 April 2007, 14:52 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Saturday, 23 June 2007, 08:21 GMT
Opened by Roberto Braga (Bobonov) - Thursday, 26 April 2007, 14:52 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Saturday, 23 June 2007, 08:21 GMT
|
DetailsIn the current eaccelerator version 0.9.5 there is a bug that in certain circumstances (not identified) generate a php error for the execution of some cached pages (the first execution is fine).
I sent an email to eaccelerator mailinglist http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4646.85.18.136.82.1177453365.squirrel%40mail.yap.it&forum_name=eaccelerator-users and they provided a patch. I made a new PKGBUILD that apply this patch file, installed it tested it and the problem is solved. In attach the patch and the new PKGBUILD Other fix/correction changed revision number from 2 to 3 added missing license tag The priority is quite high since website pages are not working randomly, I had problem with tcpdf, phpmyvisites, and two web application to which I work upon |
This task depends upon
Closed by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre)
Saturday, 23 June 2007, 08:21 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: should be fixed with 0.9.5.1 (moved to [community])
Saturday, 23 June 2007, 08:21 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: should be fixed with 0.9.5.1 (moved to [community])
cache.patch
Personally I would pay more attention to xcache (part of the lighttpd project) as way more development happens in there.