Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#69838 - [mmtf-cpp] and [libmmtf] are the same packages?
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Michal Wojdyla (micwoj92) - Monday, 01 March 2021, 03:24 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Monday, 01 March 2021, 08:39 GMT
Opened by Michal Wojdyla (micwoj92) - Monday, 01 March 2021, 03:24 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Monday, 01 March 2021, 08:39 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: It seems that libmmtf and mmtf-cpp are the same package These packages conflict every file but license and they pull from the same source and the only practical difference in PKGBUILDS is that one has-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ option.
Additional info: Version: 1.0.0-2 (both packages) It seems that libmmtf was in the repos first. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) -
Monday, 01 March 2021, 08:39 GMT
Removed libmmtf, which is wrongly named (the package doesn't even ship a library, and there are other language implementations). Also moved mmtf-cpp to community, so feel free to comaintain @FFY00