Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#69602 - [pacman] Make pacman-mirrorlist optional
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Anton Rieger (arcbug) - Tuesday, 09 February 2021, 20:12 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 11 February 2021, 11:02 GMT
Opened by Anton Rieger (arcbug) - Tuesday, 09 February 2021, 20:12 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 11 February 2021, 11:02 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
pacman-mirrorlist is redundant in setups there the mirror never changes or if https://archlinux.org/mirrorlist/ is used to generate it. So I propose to make it an optional dependency. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Thursday, 11 February 2021, 11:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Thursday, 11 February 2021, 11:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
OTOH, lowering it to an optional dependency would lead to broken end-user systems by default, unless we enforced it via the base metapackage anyway. And there's no real downside to this tiny package, which won't override your existing mirrorlist since it creates pacnew files instead.
An "example" mirrorlist could be provided to still satisfy the OOTB experience. Though this could lead to people not upgrading it.
On the other hand the same can happen with an ignored mirrorlist.pacnew.
I understand your reasoning though. Thus it's under general gripe and very low.