FS#68972 - [ntp] please consider ntpsec replacement
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Monday, 14 December 2020, 13:03 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:24 GMT
Opened by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Monday, 14 December 2020, 13:03 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:24 GMT
|
Details
I've found Fedora replacing ntp with ntpsec
(https://www.ntpsec.org/)
for good maintenance and security reasons: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NtpReplacement - no spec file so far We have it available in AUR - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntpsec It looks like a valid and solid dropin-replacement. Please consider switching over to ntpsec for security reasons and a more community friendly version and an open development process. Maybe we should also ask our devops team if they have an opinion on this. Not sure if your server rely on it. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot)
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:24 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/ntp/issues/2
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:24 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/ntp/issues/2
Arch Linux has all the tools to do the same via the chrony package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/chrony/ (see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chrony).
Personally I don't understand why the community chrony package is taking that long to get updated to 4.0, which added support for NTS out-of-the-box: https://chrony.tuxfamily.org/news.html