Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#68775 - [nota] conflicts with AUR package of the same name
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by helle vaanzinn (glitsj16) - Saturday, 28 November 2020, 16:59 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Saturday, 28 November 2020, 19:22 GMT
Opened by helle vaanzinn (glitsj16) - Saturday, 28 November 2020, 16:59 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Saturday, 28 November 2020, 19:22 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I have been using [nota](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nota/) from the AUR for a while now. Just noticed that the community repo also added a nota package. Besides the package name potentially causing confusion, both install /usr/bin/nota, confusing pacman. Not sure about the recommended way of dealing with clashes like this, just wanted to bring it to the maintainer's attention. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. * link to upstream bug report, if any Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon
Closed by Antonio Rojas (arojas)
Saturday, 28 November 2020, 19:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Renamed
Saturday, 28 November 2020, 19:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Renamed