Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#68640 - [ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols] [ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols-mono] Mono and non-mono variants shouldn't conflict
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Oliver Ford (OJFord) - Monday, 16 November 2020, 13:10 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Monday, 16 November 2020, 17:21 GMT
Opened by Oliver Ford (OJFord) - Monday, 16 November 2020, 13:10 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Monday, 16 November 2020, 17:21 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols{,-mono} are specified as conflicting with each other. Why? I would like the monospace variant as a fallback for my monospace font, and the proportional variant as a fallback for my {sans-}serif fonts. Steps to reproduce: - pacman -S ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols{,-mono} |
This task depends upon

I confirm the issue

If you find a solution, please share!

Sorry, a solution to what? Why do they need to be marked as conflicting - because of `usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/10-nerd-font-symbols.conf` being common to both?