Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#68554 - [home-assistant] Missing dependency - python-httpx
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by jayki (jayki) - Saturday, 07 November 2020, 18:13 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Saturday, 05 December 2020, 17:48 GMT
Opened by jayki (jayki) - Saturday, 07 November 2020, 18:13 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Saturday, 05 December 2020, 17:48 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
hass: pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'httpx>=0.16.1' distribution was not found and is required by homeassistant Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. * link to upstream bug report, if any Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon
Closed by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd)
Saturday, 05 December 2020, 17:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 0.118.5
Saturday, 05 December 2020, 17:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 0.118.5
Comment by Luiz Ribeiro (luizribeiro) -
Saturday, 07 November 2020, 21:55 GMT
Same error for me. I was able to workaround this by simply installing `python-httpx`, so a simple PKGBUILD change here should fix this issue.
Comment by Guillaume (Tabs) -
Sunday, 22 November 2020, 09:13 GMT
Same here, not corrected yet. Installing `python-httpx` worked but it would be good to register it as a dependency of the package home-assistant.
Comment by Overand (overand) -
Monday, 23 November 2020, 23:19 GMT
I doubt commenting again is helpful, but, here I am to say "Yep, same here." Perhaps when the next revision gets packaged up, this will be resolved.
Comment by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) -
Tuesday, 24 November 2020, 07:48 GMT
And yet you did... We're in the middle of a python 3.9 rebuild, this will have to wait until it's done.