Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#67361 - [rgbds] 0.4.0-3 Version number format differs from when built from source
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Eldred Habert (ISSOtm) - Wednesday, 22 July 2020, 14:13 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Thursday, 23 July 2020, 12:08 GMT
Opened by Eldred Habert (ISSOtm) - Wednesday, 22 July 2020, 14:13 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Thursday, 23 July 2020, 12:08 GMT
|
DetailsThe version number enforced by the PKGBUILD differs from release numbers in that it's missing a "v" in front of the version proper.
issotm@sheik-kitty ~/rgbds% pacman -Q rgbds rgbds 0.4.0-3 issotm@sheik-kitty ~/rgbds% rgbasm -V rgbasm 0.4.0 issotm@sheik-kitty ~/rgbds% ./rgbasm -V rgbasm v0.4.0 It's worth noting that upstream has a fallback if the version string comes empty: https://github.com/rednex/rgbds/blob/fcd37b52b69fc652427cc8216a9a20c04143cc87/src/version.c#L19-L25 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd)
Thursday, 23 July 2020, 12:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Switched to cmake which also strips the v by default, this bug is invalid.
Thursday, 23 July 2020, 12:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Switched to cmake which also strips the v by default, this bug is invalid.
Comment by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) -
Wednesday, 22 July 2020, 15:07 GMT
What's your point? Why do we care about a missing v which is essentially useless?