Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#66593 - [pd] problem with extras fiddle~ and bonk~ (undefined symbols)

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Niklas Reppel (parkellipsen) - Saturday, 09 May 2020, 13:04 GMT
Last edited by David Runge (dvzrv) - Saturday, 09 May 2020, 19:22 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To David Runge (dvzrv)
Architecture x86_64
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:

The [bonk~] and [fiddle~] objects can't be loaded, due to possible underlinking (see closed upstream bug report), so it might
be a packaging/build problem ?

Error message is:

/usr/lib/pd/extra/bonk~/bonk~.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd/extra/bonk~/bonk~.pd_linux: undefined symbol: __exp_finite
/usr/lib/pd/extra/bonk~/bonk~.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd/extra/bonk~/bonk~.pd_linux: undefined symbol: __exp_finite
/usr/lib/pd/extra/bonk~/bonk~.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd/extra/bonk~/bonk~.pd_linux: undefined symbol: __exp_finite
bonk~
... couldn't create

Additional info:
* package version(s): 0.50.2-2
* upstream bug report: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/975

Steps to reproduce:
* open pd
* create a new patch
* insert a [fiddle~] or [bonk~] object
This task depends upon

Closed by  David Runge (dvzrv)
Saturday, 09 May 2020, 19:22 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  Fixed with pd 0.50.2-3
Comment by David Runge (dvzrv) - Saturday, 09 May 2020, 19:20 GMT
@parkellipsen: Thanks for the report!

This is glibc 2.30 -> 2.31 related. I have just rebuilt the package against the current toolchain, which fixes the issue and commented on this upstream [1].

[1] https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/975#issuecomment-626223235

Loading...