Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#66481 - [v4l-utils] does not enforce its dependency on package qt5-base
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Ed Eyles (Ghepardo) - Thursday, 30 April 2020, 18:13 GMT
Last edited by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Saturday, 02 May 2020, 19:33 GMT
Opened by Ed Eyles (Ghepardo) - Thursday, 30 April 2020, 18:13 GMT
Last edited by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Saturday, 02 May 2020, 19:33 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: Without package qt5-base installed, install package v4l-utils, then attempt to run executable qv4l2 which has been provided by the package. This fails to run, with error:
qv4l2: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5OpenGL.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I believe the v4l-utils package should enforce its dependency on the qt5-base package, which provides the library libQt5OpenGL. (I see that this library is also supplied by the package cuda, but a dependency on qt5-base would seem more natural.) Additional info: * package version(s): extra/v4l-utils 1.18.0-1 * config and/or log files etc.: NA * link to upstream bug report, if any: NA Steps to reproduce: See Description above. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jelle van der Waa (jelly)
Saturday, 02 May 2020, 19:33 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: v4l-utils-1.18.0-2
Saturday, 02 May 2020, 19:33 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: v4l-utils-1.18.0-2
I believe that optional dependency is already declared in the package, so does anything further need to be done? @Doug you referred to a missing description?