Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#65710 - [k9s] revision shows as dev, not actual version number
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Ben Woodward (Sacro) - Thursday, 05 March 2020, 11:34 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Saturday, 07 March 2020, 13:22 GMT
Opened by Ben Woodward (Sacro) - Thursday, 05 March 2020, 11:34 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Saturday, 07 March 2020, 13:22 GMT
|
Details9s Rev: dev - should be 0.17.1
Also running `k9s version` from the command line gives: Version: dev Commit: dev Date: n/a Which is wrong too. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Morten Linderud (Foxboron)
Saturday, 07 March 2020, 13:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 0.17.5-1
Saturday, 07 March 2020, 13:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 0.17.5-1
Split out the commit used in source so it can be reused.
Use git committer date, strict ISO 8601 format.
@Sacro with this updated PKGBUILD does k9s produce output you were expecting?