Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#6512 - Missing Picture(s) in Thunderbird
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Anonymous (Chaos-Keeper) - Thursday, 01 March 2007, 20:56 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Friday, 27 April 2007, 22:54 GMT
Opened by Anonymous (Chaos-Keeper) - Thursday, 01 March 2007, 20:56 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Friday, 27 April 2007, 22:54 GMT
|
DetailsI notized through the moztraybiff-extension ( http://moztraybiff.mozdev.org/ ), that there are some pictures missing in the thunderbird-tar-balls from pacman. The Bugreport could be like this:debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org/msg107365.html"> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org/msg107365.html
but I got the solution for this problem (which is the same as the linked one); The problem is the image messengerWindow16.xpm that ist missing in the pacman-tarball. It should be placed in /opt/mozilla/lib/thunderbird/chrome/icons/default I recognized that in the package from the thunderbird-mail-homepage there are in generel more pictures in this folder. I don't know, what the other pictures are used for, if they are neccessary, but it would be nice, if this problem gets solved and I get to know, what the meaning of the other pictures is. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Anonymous (Chaos-Keeper) -
Monday, 19 March 2007, 21:07 GMT
Still not fixed, even if a new Thunderbird-Version is out. Is it really a big problem to add a simple picture to the package?