Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#65111 - [ruby-rugged] package fails in removing *.so files
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Andreas Baumann (andreas_baumann) - Saturday, 11 January 2020, 08:49 GMT
Last edited by David Runge (dvzrv) - Sunday, 12 January 2020, 21:31 GMT
Opened by Andreas Baumann (andreas_baumann) - Saturday, 11 January 2020, 08:49 GMT
Last edited by David Runge (dvzrv) - Sunday, 12 January 2020, 21:31 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Starting package()... ... rm: cannot remove 'gems/rugged-0.28.4.1/lib/*/*.so': No such file or directory ... ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Build failed, check /var/lib/archbuild/staging-x86_64/abaumann/build # removing all unneeded stuff rm -rv cache gems/${_name}-${pkgver}/{ext,lib/*/*.so} \ extensions/*/*/${_name}-${pkgver}/{mkmf.log,gem_make.out} \ gems/${_name}-${pkgver}/vendor The question is, should those *.so files exist? As all this stuff is not used (by comment) I just removed the *.so from the glob. Additional info: * package version(s): 0.28.4.1-2 Steps to reproduce: asp32 export community/ruby-rugged cd ruby-rugged staging-x86_64-build |
This task depends upon
Closed by David Runge (dvzrv)
Sunday, 12 January 2020, 21:31 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 0.28.4.1-3
Sunday, 12 January 2020, 21:31 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 0.28.4.1-3