Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#64978 - Dependency should not be "optional" between "Discover" and "Packagekit-qt5"
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by metacryptic (metacryptic) - Sunday, 29 December 2019, 10:00 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 29 December 2019, 10:37 GMT
Opened by metacryptic (metacryptic) - Sunday, 29 December 2019, 10:00 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 29 December 2019, 10:37 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Hi, using Arch linux since 1998, and Arch is my distro for years now and I'am very happy with it :) specially the KISS principle and the Rowling release that is sooo great. This message to point out a little malfunction (for me). Using weekly "sudo pacman", on KDE, I try recently "Discover" witch is installed. But with it, I've no access to the "repository" so I search a while and find that the package "packagekit-qt5" was not installed. => on the arch page for discover the dependencies say that packagekit-qt5 is "optional". => seems that the dependency should not be "optional" because manage package without it is difficult. => well I thought that discover wasn't working before I install packagekit. What do you think ? Additional info: * packagekit-qt5-1.0.1-1-x86_64 * discover 5.17.4-1 (plasma) Steps to reproduce: try using discover out of the box : no repository management |
This task depends upon
This sounds exactly like an optional dependency. If you want to manage Arch packages from discover, you need packagekit-qt5. If you don't, you don't.
no arch packages and no flatpak !
it's sounds like a car without any wheels :)
For me it should at least having arch package management on a arch distro and flatpak as optional