Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#64947 - [deluge] python-xdg xdg-utils to optdepends?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Steve M (smmalis37) - Monday, 23 December 2019, 19:02 GMT
Last edited by Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) - Friday, 21 February 2020, 16:01 GMT
Opened by Steve M (smmalis37) - Monday, 23 December 2019, 19:02 GMT
Last edited by Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) - Friday, 21 February 2020, 16:01 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I run deluge on a headless server, and it'd be nice to not have to install anything relating to xdg or X. I've tried running with these packages removed with pacman -Rdd for a few weeks and experienced no issues. Would it be possible to make these packages optional? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
Friday, 21 February 2020, 16:01 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: xdg-utils moved to the new deluge-gtk package.
Friday, 21 February 2020, 16:01 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: xdg-utils moved to the new deluge-gtk package.
I've tried running with these packages removed with pacman -Rdd for a few weeks and experienced no issues. Would it be possible to make these packages optional?
The functions which run subprocess.Popen using xdg-open are indeed only used by the gtk UI.
Your split PKGBUILD does not answer the primary purpose of this bug ticket at all, since its -common subpackage depends on xdg-open and python-xdg despite those being what the OP wishes moved to the gtk UI only (the former being a valid discussion point, the latter being wrong).