Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#64505 - [glslang] .cmake files pollute /lib/cmake
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alexandre Demers (oxalin) - Friday, 15 November 2019, 04:29 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Monday, 02 December 2019, 10:38 GMT
Opened by Alexandre Demers (oxalin) - Friday, 15 November 2019, 04:29 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Monday, 02 December 2019, 10:38 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: Since 7.13.3496, new .cmake files were introduced to the package. While it could be fine to put them directly under /lib/cmake/, it would be better to have them under a common folder as it is done for all the other packages that install .cmake files.
By the way, I'm the maintainer of lib32-glslang under AUR. If the files are moved to a specific folder, I'll have to mirror it under /lib32/cmake. Additional info: * package version(s): 7.13.3496 Steps to reproduce: Install the package and have a look under /lib/cmake to see how the files are installed compared to the ones from other packages. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro)
Monday, 02 December 2019, 10:38 GMT
Reason for closing: No response
Monday, 02 December 2019, 10:38 GMT
Reason for closing: No response
Now, there is another bug that needs to be fixed upstream (already reported) and I'm waiting to hear from the glslang's developers about it: in which folder(s) under cmake should all the .cmake files be installed. I'll let you know once I'll have an answer.
Since it's merged to upstream master, it'll be in the next release and you could then drop the patch from your own package. Could you link the discussion about the clutter?