Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#6375 - bad vim and gvim package descriptions
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Philip Nilsson (leffe) - Thursday, 08 February 2007, 10:38 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 09 February 2007, 10:39 GMT
Opened by Philip Nilsson (leffe) - Thursday, 08 February 2007, 10:38 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 09 February 2007, 10:39 GMT
|
DetailsThe vim and gvim packages have the following description:
"VIM 7 - Vi IMproved console" 1) It uses capitals, which is not the norm. 2) It does not describe the package. 3) The description is the same for gvim as for vim. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Thursday, 15 March 2007, 15:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in CVS, new package coming soon
Thursday, 15 March 2007, 15:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in CVS, new package coming soon
(from www.vim.org, kinda)
for vim: a highly configurable, improved version of the vi text editor built to enable efficient text editing
for gvim: the vim text editor with advanced features enabled, such as a gui mode
Opinions?