Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#6310 - man page for BitchX not installed correctly
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Glenn Becker (chexmix) - Tuesday, 30 January 2007, 19:02 GMT
Opened by Glenn Becker (chexmix) - Tuesday, 30 January 2007, 19:02 GMT
|
DetailsOn my system (which is actually 0.8), I noticed that 'man BitchX' was spitting out a terminal full of garbage. So I looked for the manpage file. It was there, but it had an extension of .bz2.gz. gunzipping, bunzip2ing and then re-gzipping gives me a good man page for BitchX. Not a big deal, but there it is (was).
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Thursday, 01 February 2007, 00:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Thursday, 01 February 2007, 00:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Comment by Jens Adam (byte) -
Tuesday, 30 January 2007, 19:17 GMT
This reminds me of http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5392