Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#62560 - systemd AppArmor support

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Victor Bessonov (Unb0rn) - Monday, 06 May 2019, 17:19 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Wednesday, 08 May 2019, 11:27 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Core
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:
Since we have apparmor in official community repo, it would be great to have apparmor-enabled systemd. If such a binary will have runtime dependencies like libapparmor, it would be great to have separate package with AppArmor support.

Additional info:
* package version(s)
242.19-1-arch

* config and/or log files etc.
systemctl --version
systemd 242 (242.19-1-arch)
+PAM +AUDIT -SELINUX -IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK -SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN +PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Wednesday, 08 May 2019, 11:27 GMT
Reason for closing:  Deferred
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Wednesday, 08 May 2019, 11:27 GMT
> Since we have apparmor in official community repo,
But adding support to systemd means we need to move apparmor to [core]. That probably isn't going to happen any time soon.

> If such a binary will have runtime dependencies like libapparmor, it would be great to have separate package with AppArmor support.
Absolutely not. This sort of split is historically fraught with bugs and duplication of efforts.

Loading...