Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#60837 - [eclipse] contains x86_64 binary blobs in architecture independent source=() array
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Erich Eckner (deepthought) - Saturday, 17 November 2018, 13:03 GMT
Last edited by Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) - Sunday, 18 November 2018, 06:45 GMT
Opened by Erich Eckner (deepthought) - Saturday, 17 November 2018, 13:03 GMT
Last edited by Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) - Sunday, 18 November 2018, 06:45 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Please do not put architecture-specific sources (like binary sources) into source=(), put it in source_x86_64=() instead. Otherwise, downstream distributions for different architectures - like archlinux32 - package this without noticing it's for x86_64 only. regards, deepthought |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
Sunday, 18 November 2018, 06:45 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in trunk
Sunday, 18 November 2018, 06:45 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in trunk
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) -
Sunday, 18 November 2018, 01:12 GMT
- Field changed: Status (Unconfirmed → Assigned)
- Field changed: Severity (Low → Very Low)
- Task assigned to Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
source_x86_64 is simply the semantically proper way to do this according to PKGBUILD syntax, and IMHO it is best to use it regardless of whether one expects the PKGBUILD to be used exclusively on x86_64 systems.