Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#60687 - [qmmp] No Opus support in 1.2.4-1
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Actually not important at all (GRUBAS) - Saturday, 03 November 2018, 15:37 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 05 November 2018, 15:27 GMT
Opened by Actually not important at all (GRUBAS) - Saturday, 03 November 2018, 15:37 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 05 November 2018, 15:27 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: It seems that there's no "Opus" plugin in the "qmmp" package v. 1.2.4-1. When I build a package on my own (via makepkg, using the official PKGBUILD from here: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/qmmp), I get the Opus plugin running, but I can't see it in the official binary and I've no idea why. I've just grabbed the source PKGBUILD, didn't change anything and it works, so I assume that the official package is buggy.
Additional info: * package version: 1.2.4-1 |
This task depends upon
Ooops, now it seems that I've made a terrible mistake...
[2018-11-03 15:35] [PACMAN] Running '/usr/bin/pacman -S --asdeps projectm libsidplayfp opusfile'
A quick glance at today's 'pacman.log' reveals that makepkg grabbed opusfile as a makedep for qmmp. I have no idea how on Earth I could miss that fact, believe me or not, I was sure that opusfile had been already installed before.
I must be tired or something, sorry for wasting your time :P