Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#59721 - [hugo] Support for hugo-extended
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Marc A. Kastner (makukasu) - Monday, 20 August 2018, 06:41 GMT
Last edited by Jaroslav Lichtblau (Dragonlord) - Sunday, 02 September 2018, 17:39 GMT
Opened by Marc A. Kastner (makukasu) - Monday, 20 August 2018, 06:41 GMT
Last edited by Jaroslav Lichtblau (Dragonlord) - Sunday, 02 September 2018, 17:39 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Is it possible to add Hugo-extended support to this package? Additional info: * Adds support for asset pipelining with SASS/SCSS. * Available since >0.43. Ref. https://gohugo.io/news/0.43-relnotes/ * Needs some extra build flag "HUGO_BUILD_TAGS=extended" when calling mage. Ref. https://gohugo.io/getting-started/installing/ * Needs some extra dependencies (CGO,) which is the reason it is an optional build flag. * Should produce a second, differently named binary "hugo-extended" |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jaroslav Lichtblau (Dragonlord)
Sunday, 02 September 2018, 17:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: Implemented in hugo-0.48-1
Sunday, 02 September 2018, 17:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: Implemented in hugo-0.48-1
EDIT: I don't agree that there should be a separate package called hugo-extended. It would be preferable if hugo (extended) was the default instance of hugo.
I fully agree that it should replace the default instance, as it would not do any harm for users who don't need it.
I wasn't suggesting a separate package, I just thought a separate binary would be the default way their build system would name it (Maybe I misread their documentation.)