Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#59629 - Update Julia to 0.7 first
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Jagannathan Tiruvallur Eachambadi (j605) - Monday, 13 August 2018, 01:13 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Monday, 20 August 2018, 08:58 GMT
Opened by Jagannathan Tiruvallur Eachambadi (j605) - Monday, 13 August 2018, 01:13 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Monday, 20 August 2018, 08:58 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-use-julia-0-7-if-you-are-upgrading/13321 Skipping 0.7 will cause people to miss deprecation warnings and that is only difference between 0.7 and 1.0 at this point. I am filing this report preemptively as I see the maintainer is trying to update Julia to 1.0 in trunk. |
This task depends upon
Packages can detect the old version that was installed if any. Are you suggesting just a warning be displayed if 0.7 has been skipped or the transaction be failed?
Or are you suggesting arch provides julia07 and julia?