FS#5958 - htop does not have a license field

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Friday, 08 December 2006, 18:37 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 08 December 2006, 22:40 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Damir Perisa (damir.perisa)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.2 Gimmick
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

htop is distributed under the GPL according to the site and the comments in the code, so adding the following line to the PKGBUILD would be applicable:

license="GPL"
This task depends upon

Closed by  Damir Perisa (damir.perisa)
Saturday, 09 December 2006, 17:23 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 08 December 2006, 22:44 GMT
Ehm, there are more than few packages in official repos with missing license field. What we should do with such bug-reports for single package?
Comment by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Saturday, 09 December 2006, 17:22 GMT
good question... i'm lazy to go through all my 300 pkgs to look what licence they are relesed under... i am doing this addition of the licence field on the run, respectively when i update a pkg and just by chance see what licence it needs. i'm for sure not going to release a new pkgrel for htop just because of this licence line... but next time i release a new version-update, this field will be in PKGBUILD as i added it now to CVS.
Comment by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Saturday, 09 December 2006, 17:23 GMT
http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/system/htop/PKGBUILD.diff?r1=1.11&r2=1.12&cvsroot=Extra&only_with_tag=HEAD

Loading...