Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#59179 - [dotnet-sdk] aspnet-runtime should at least be an optional dependency
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Sergio Tridente (TioDuke) - Thursday, 28 June 2018, 22:10 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 09 July 2018, 06:00 GMT
Opened by Sergio Tridente (TioDuke) - Thursday, 28 June 2018, 22:10 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 09 July 2018, 06:00 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Package aspnet-runtime used to be a dependency for dotnet-sdk. It should at least be an optional dependency. Additional info: * package version(s) : 2.1.1+301-1 Steps to reproduce: None. It should be at least an optional dependency |
This task depends upon
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Friday, 29 June 2018, 07:18 GMT
Why?
Comment by Sergio Tridente (TioDuke) -
Saturday, 30 June 2018, 02:31 GMT
The dotnet-sdk is used for developieng dotnet (code) applications. That's why it requires the dotnet-runtime. Now, if you want to develop aspnet dotnet applications you need the aspnet-runtime. That's why I believe it should be made an optional dependency for dotnet-sdk
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Wednesday, 04 July 2018, 02:47 GMT
That doesn't sound right. The deps are for running the software, not for what you want to develop.