Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#5917 - Some packages have problematic version numbers
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Matt (v01d) - Friday, 01 December 2006, 15:12 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Kieslich (tobias) - Monday, 09 April 2007, 23:06 GMT
Opened by Matt (v01d) - Friday, 01 December 2006, 15:12 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Kieslich (tobias) - Monday, 09 April 2007, 23:06 GMT
|
DetailsPackages which use letters in their version numbers confuse pacman. I have found 2, but I think there are more:
blender 2.42a-1, proftpd 1.3.0a-1. For example, the message for proftpd is: :: proftpd: local (1.3.0-3) appears to be newer than repo (current/1.3.0a-1) but 1.3.0a is the latest version (the previous one, 1.3.0-3). I guess several PKGBUILDs need to be corrected. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Tobias Kieslich (tobias)
Monday, 09 April 2007, 23:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: as of blender 2.43
Monday, 09 April 2007, 23:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: as of blender 2.43
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) -
Saturday, 02 December 2006, 14:37 GMT
proftpd fixed