Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#59133 - [stfl] Please provide intermediate versioned symlinked to libstfl.0.24
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Earnestly (Earnest) - Sunday, 24 June 2018, 17:49 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 25 June 2018, 00:02 GMT
Opened by Earnestly (Earnest) - Sunday, 24 June 2018, 17:49 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 25 June 2018, 00:02 GMT
|
DetailsWhile stfl appears to provide both libstfl.so and libstfl.so.0.24 because it doesn't provide libstfl.so.0 ldconfig will generate this file implicitly.
This means the /usr/lib/libstfl.so.0 is unowned by any package on the system. A workaround, if upstream is not responsive, is to manually provide this by doing something like: ln -s libstfl.so."${pkgver%.*}" "$pkgdir"/usr/lib/libstfl.so."$pkgver" The downside is people upgrading will experience file conflicts with the new package so it may need a news item. This situation is similar to the task involving astyle: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59132 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Monday, 25 June 2018, 00:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Additional comments about closing: FS#34890
Monday, 25 June 2018, 00:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Additional comments about closing:
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Monday, 25 June 2018, 00:01 GMT
I wouldn't assume the soname is based on the version. You'd really want to pull the soname from the lib itself to make the symlink.