Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#589 - broken dependency in gtk-doc
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by William DeMoss II (wdemoss) - Sunday, 21 March 2004, 04:15 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Sunday, 21 March 2004, 16:14 GMT
Opened by William DeMoss II (wdemoss) - Sunday, 21 March 2004, 04:15 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Sunday, 21 March 2004, 16:14 GMT
|
Detailsgtk-doc has a broken dependency on jade which replaced openjade. Currently when a makepkg is done a Missing dependency is reported for openjade. Also, when a pacman -S gtk-doc is performed, a "cannot resolve dependency" error is reported for openjade.
|
This task depends upon
Comment by William DeMoss II (wdemoss) -
Sunday, 21 March 2004, 04:47 GMT
Oops, didn't mean to make this very low, is actually pretty high since it affects installing gnome.
Comment by Lim Seng (mambolim1) -
Sunday, 21 March 2004, 11:16 GMT
This has also affected the installation of firestarter.
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Sunday, 21 March 2004, 13:18 GMT
gtk-doc isn't even required for running those packages, packages only need gtk-doc to build documentation on build-time, so that package should be a build dependency (and it's still optional then)