Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#58898 - [pacman-contrib] does not list awk and gettext as dependencies but paccache requires them
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by James Cook (bonkabonka) - Wednesday, 06 June 2018, 20:18 GMT
Last edited by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Thursday, 07 June 2018, 00:15 GMT
Opened by James Cook (bonkabonka) - Wednesday, 06 June 2018, 20:18 GMT
Last edited by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Thursday, 07 June 2018, 00:15 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
paccache wants to use `gettext` and `awk` but the package does not depend on them. Additional info: * package version(s) pacman-contrib-1.0.0-2 Steps to reproduce: Start with a minimal Docker image that includes just pacman and its dependencies. # pacman -S pacman-contrib # paccache /usr/sbin/paccache: line 65: gettext: command not found ==> no operation specified (use -h for help) # paccache --dryrun --uninstalled --verbose --cachedir /arch_repo/myrepo/x86_64/ --keep 1 /usr/sbin/paccache: line 217: awk: command not found ==> no candidate packages found for pruning |
This task depends upon
Closed by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz)
Thursday, 07 June 2018, 00:15 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: We have no policy to require packages in the base group to be listed as explicit dependencies.
Thursday, 07 June 2018, 00:15 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: We have no policy to require packages in the base group to be listed as explicit dependencies.
Comment by loqs (loqs) -
Wednesday, 06 June 2018, 22:44 GMT
Both are in the base group and it is left to the maintainer to decide if such packages should be listed as dependencies or not.