Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#58263 - js52 should 'replace' js
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Bernhard Landauer (oberon) - Wednesday, 18 April 2018, 23:24 GMT
Last edited by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Thursday, 19 April 2018, 00:14 GMT
Opened by Bernhard Landauer (oberon) - Wednesday, 18 April 2018, 23:24 GMT
Last edited by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Thursday, 19 April 2018, 00:14 GMT
|
DetailsSince js got removed I think it would make sense to have js52 officially 'replace' it.
Else it will remain sleepin indefinitely on systems... |
This task depends upon
Closed by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz)
Thursday, 19 April 2018, 00:14 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: "people might not bother to remove old packages that don't do anything" is not a reason to report inaccurate information in the metadata. Those people do not necessarily need js52 any more than js, or alternatively might need js itself for their own reasons.
Thursday, 19 April 2018, 00:14 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: "people might not bother to remove old packages that don't do anything" is not a reason to report inaccurate information in the metadata. Those people do not necessarily need js52 any more than js, or alternatively might need js itself for their own reasons.
Arch still ships three js packages because they are incompatible. If a package still actually relies on js the replaces will remove it without providing a replacement.