Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#5816 - Three more holes in XULRunner
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Friday, 10 November 2006, 23:45 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 11 November 2006, 11:02 GMT
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Friday, 10 November 2006, 23:45 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 11 November 2006, 11:02 GMT
|
DetailsMore bugs that need to be fixed in XULRunner, which Mozilla seems intent on doing nothing about:
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2006/mfsa2006-65.html http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2006/mfsa2006-66.html http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2006/mfsa2006-67.html These affect Firefox 1.5.x, but not 2.0, so I guess using a current CVS snapshot would work, if we're willing to put up with the shortfalls of Gecko as of 2.0. |
This task depends upon