FS#57802 - [qt5-base] Cannot resize columns or select which should be shown
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Daniel Bedrenko (dbedrenko) - Monday, 12 March 2018, 11:20 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Monday, 12 March 2018, 13:29 GMT
Opened by Daniel Bedrenko (dbedrenko) - Monday, 12 March 2018, 11:20 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Monday, 12 March 2018, 13:29 GMT
|
Details
Description:
After upgrading package version 5.10.1-2 -> 5.10.1-4 a Qt application I use "dlt-viewer" has broken column behaviour. This make it unusable except with great inconvenience. I suspect this is caused by the patch applied in pkgrel=4 : https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/qt5-base&id=9353e3ab99d60725e1d3b87d03da7c38dc76877a Here is a screenshot of how the columns look now: http://storage8.static.itmages.com/i/18/0312/h_1520853393_7945084_07b756484d.png The same application worked fine prior to the upgrade. Effect: A) All columns default to an equal width which is too wide for the window. B) After resizing a column, when a new row is inserted into the table view the column resizes back to the default. C) No longer able to hide/show columns Expected behaviour: A) Each column has its own predefined (by the developer) reasonable width B) After manually resizing, the size should not change by itself C) Be able to hide/show columns via the Settings dialogue. Steps to reproduce: 1. Install and start `dlt-viewer` $ yaourt -S --noconfirm dlt-viewer $ dlt_viewer 2. Notice the columns are too wide by default. 3. File -> Settings -> Project Table -> Deselect for example "Show Index"-> OK 4. Notice the "Index" column is still shown. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Antonio Rojas (arojas)
Monday, 12 March 2018, 13:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: qt5-base 5.10.1-5
Monday, 12 March 2018, 13:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: qt5-base 5.10.1-5
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) -
Monday, 12 March 2018, 12:27 GMT
Comment by
Daniel Bedrenko (dbedrenko) -
Monday, 12 March 2018, 13:01 GMT
Are you completely sure that this worked for you with 5.10.1-2?
Because this looks to me like an upstream regression in 5.10.1
@arojas You're right, my mistake. I checked through my pacman log
and I'm confident that it was the qt5-base (5.10.0-1 ->
5.10.1-2) upgrade that broke it.