Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#57478 - [ttf-font-awesome] 5.0.6 has lots of missing glyphs compared to 5.0.2
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Bob Somers (MagicBobert) - Monday, 12 February 2018, 08:46 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:36 GMT
Opened by Bob Somers (MagicBobert) - Monday, 12 February 2018, 08:46 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:36 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I just updated from version 5.0.2 to 5.0.6 and there are tons of missing glyphs. You can confirm this by scrolling through the glyphs in the Unicode Private Use Area in gucharmap. Reverting to the 5.0.2 package fixed the missing glyphs for me. Steps to reproduce: 1. Upgrade to 5.0.6. 2. Run gucharmap. 3. Select Font Awesome 5 Free. 4. Select Private Use Area under Unicode Block. 5. Look for areas with popular glyphs. Notice all the missing glyphs around them. 6. Compare to 5.0.2 to see what's missing. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Morten Linderud (Foxboron)
Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 5.0.6-2 fixes this problem
Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 5.0.6-2 fixes this problem
Comment by Connor (cprussin) -
Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 13:08 GMT
- Field changed: Percent Complete (100% → 0%)
I'm fairly sure this is caused by the change from including web-fonts-with-css/webfonts/*.ttf to only including web-fonts-with-css/webfonts/fa-regular-400.ttf. Is there any context on why you're not including all 3 ttf files any more?
Comment by hubcaps (hubcaps) -
Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:20 GMT
That's 100% the reason for the change, mainly missing the Brands .ttf(fa-brands-400.ttf) which houses almost all the fun glyphs people enjoy using.
Comment by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) -
Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:36 GMT
Right sorry. I have no recollections of why the line only including `fa-regular-400.ttf` was added, however the change has been reverted and a new package has been pushed.