Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#5707 - Info packages
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alberto Simoes (ambs) - Sunday, 29 October 2006, 18:45 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Wednesday, 08 November 2006, 21:48 GMT
Opened by Alberto Simoes (ambs) - Sunday, 29 October 2006, 18:45 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Wednesday, 08 November 2006, 21:48 GMT
|
DetailsHi
I just noticed that there are two packages for info files for emacs and gcc. The truth is that a lot of gnu software have their documentation in info files (flex, bison, gsl and much more) but there aren't info packages for them. Is this a design option taken by ArchLinux, or should I open bug-reports on all those packages that miss them? I really think info files are important. For instance, the info file from bison and gsl are complete reference manuals, almost books. TIA Alberto |
This task depends upon
Closed by Judd Vinet (judd)
Sunday, 12 November 2006, 23:31 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Sorry, Arch has a stance that we don't include info files with packages. Use the comprehensive online manuals if you need them.
Sunday, 12 November 2006, 23:31 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Sorry, Arch has a stance that we don't include info files with packages. Use the comprehensive online manuals if you need them.
Take look at this feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3459 there are many comments on this topic.