Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#57015 - [unicorn] Rename ruby-unicorn to ruby-unicorn-engine
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Anatol Pomozov (anatolik) - Monday, 08 January 2018, 18:41 GMT
Last edited by Levente Polyak (anthraxx) - Wednesday, 28 February 2018, 19:50 GMT
Opened by Anatol Pomozov (anatolik) - Monday, 08 January 2018, 18:41 GMT
Last edited by Levente Polyak (anthraxx) - Wednesday, 28 February 2018, 19:50 GMT
|
DetailsThere is a standard practice to call ruby gem packages based on its upstream gem name.
ruby-unicorn that is currently in [community] corresponds to `unicorn-engine` gem https://rubygems.org/gems/unicorn-engine thus the package should be called `ruby-unicorn-engine`. Current name `ruby-unicorn` creates confusion with well known Ruby server called `unicorn` https://rubygems.org/gems/unicorn |
This task depends upon
Closed by Levente Polyak (anthraxx)
Wednesday, 28 February 2018, 19:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: 1.0.1-4
Wednesday, 28 February 2018, 19:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: 1.0.1-4
But even without it one should follow upstream naming. The gem name for this project is `unicorn-engine`.
You exactly know how the situation turned up and there was no such gem published, neither unicorn webserver anywhere AUR (so why even add it out of nowhere just because?) or repo. A project that did not publish its gem just used this name so it got packaged... and we landed where we are. Unlicky situation but please don't pretend you don't know how this happened. It was only renamed lately and its a in-dev situation no release that easily take it that way.
Instead of just bitching, you could actually try helping instead of threatening to remove it.