Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#566 - replace /bin/su with file from coreutils
|
Details/bin/su provided with coreutils is more functional than the current one we're using from the shadow package. I haven't given it a full testing, but coreutils su has been running on a couple of my boxes for a couple days now with no noticable problems. All of the <recent> other distros that I have access to also use coreutils su binary.
[root@rock root]# su -s /bin/bash dale [dale@rock root]$ exit [root@rock root]# pacman -S shadow :: shadow-4.0.4.1-1: is up to date. Upgrade anyway? [Y/n] Targets: shadow-4.0.4.1-1 Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n] checking package integrity... done. loading package data... done. checking for file conflicts... done. upgrading shadow... done. [root@rock root]# su -s /bin/bash dale [root@rock root]# id uid=0(root) gid=0(root) (..shortened..) [root@rock root]# exit exit [root@rock root]# |
This task depends upon
coreutils-pam.patch
PKGBUILD
The only problem now is getting around the file conflicts with shadow.