Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#56545 - [i3lock] use system-local-login instead of system-auth
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Saturday, 02 December 2017, 21:47 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Friday, 05 May 2023, 03:01 GMT
Opened by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Saturday, 02 December 2017, 21:47 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Friday, 05 May 2023, 03:01 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Currently i3lock uses the system-auth pam file for authentication, however it should probably be using system-local-login instead as that denotes the login mechanism for local login. An example is when you want to use a yubikey for local logins. Currently the required pam line has to be inserted into /etc/pam.d/i3lock, as well as /etc/pam.d/system-local-login. The latter should be sufficient for all local logins. Solution: Change the sed line to: sed -i -e 's:login:system-local-login:' i3lock.pam |
This task depends upon
Closed by Toolybird (Toolybird)
Friday, 05 May 2023, 03:01 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: See final comment
Friday, 05 May 2023, 03:01 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: See final comment
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) -
Sunday, 03 December 2017, 03:21 GMT
- Field changed: Status (Unconfirmed → Assigned)
- Task assigned to Levente Polyak (anthraxx)
Foxboron, this was orphaned when ttoepper retired, and then adopted by anthraxx (but hasn't been updated except to rebuild with a valid signing key)... given all that, I suspect he may be amenable to you co/maintaining it, assuming you're interested. :)
Comment by Toolybird (Toolybird) -
Wednesday, 05 April 2023, 05:17 GMT
This is a very old ticket. Does anyone still care about it? If not, I propose closure due to lack of interest.