Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#5637 - zlib/libpng license shouldn't be a common license
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Aaron Bull Schaefer (elasticdog) - Saturday, 21 October 2006, 04:06 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:05 GMT
Opened by Aaron Bull Schaefer (elasticdog) - Saturday, 21 October 2006, 04:06 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:05 GMT
|
DetailsThe zlib/libpng license should not be included in the common licenses package due to having similar customization requirements as the BSD/MIT licenses. There is a line that must have the year and copyright holders filled out for each use of the license. As per the Arch Packaging Standards, this should qualify it for needing a custom license for each package that uses it. For a better explanation and details, see this thread on the forums:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=26168&highlight= |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in 2.0 pkg
Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in 2.0 pkg
Only the actual change to license package is needed.