Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#56024 - [qupzilla] Frequent crashs
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Shay G (Tharbad) - Tuesday, 17 October 2017, 17:39 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Thursday, 19 October 2017, 19:09 GMT
Opened by Shay G (Tharbad) - Tuesday, 17 October 2017, 17:39 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Thursday, 19 October 2017, 19:09 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
After upgrading to v2.2.0 I have frequent crashes. See here: https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/issues/2481. Had to go back to 2.1.2. It was suggested in github that I should compile 2.2.0 against the current qt-base version (5.9.2). But before I go to compile from source I would like to know if this even relevant. So is it? Additional info: * package version(s): 2.2.0 * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: Open qupzilla and try to surf. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Antonio Rojas (arojas)
Thursday, 19 October 2017, 19:09 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: qupzilla 2.2.0-2
Thursday, 19 October 2017, 19:09 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: qupzilla 2.2.0-2
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) -
Tuesday, 17 October 2017, 18:32 GMT
No, the Qt version it was compiled against should not be relevant. In any case, please test http://pkgbuild.com/~arojas/qupzilla-2.2.0-1.1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
Comment by Shay G (Tharbad) -
Wednesday, 18 October 2017, 17:22 GMT
That's works fine. What that means?