Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#55959 - [java-runtime-common][java-environment-common] Wrong Upstream URLs

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125) - Thursday, 12 October 2017, 06:07 GMT
Last edited by freswa (frederik) - Sunday, 13 September 2020, 09:57 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Angel Velasquez (angvp)
Guillaume ALAUX (galaux)
Architecture All
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
"Upstream URL" field in the following packages are wrong:

https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/java-runtime-common/
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/java-environment-common/

It should be https://www.archlinux.org/ instead of www.archlinux.org

Additional info:
java-environment-common 3-1
java-runtime-common 3-1

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/java-runtime-common/ in Firefox
2. Hit the Upstream URL link
3. Firefox goes to https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/java-environment-common/www.archlinux.org instead of https://www.archlinux.org
This task depends upon

Closed by  freswa (frederik)
Sunday, 13 September 2020, 09:57 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  Fixed in https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-pa ckages/commit/4cc72990c8d24112ee12c3427e 06c7d91f319bb5
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 12 October 2017, 16:13 GMT
Seems more like an archweb problem
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Thursday, 12 October 2017, 21:22 GMT
No it isn't, the PKGUILD has www.archlinux.org as url with http:// or https://.
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 12 October 2017, 23:08 GMT
I can't see anywhere that says that the URL has to include the protocol. It's still a valid URL this way so without http(s):// would seem to be valid for the url variable

Loading...