Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#55809 - [linux 4.13.3-1] unable to mount samba share
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by hopimet (hopimet) - Friday, 29 September 2017, 16:59 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Saturday, 30 September 2017, 12:11 GMT
Opened by hopimet (hopimet) - Friday, 29 September 2017, 16:59 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Saturday, 30 September 2017, 12:11 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I have a samba share on a raspberry pi running with debian jessie. On my laptop with archlinux, I used to mount this samba share with the following command line: sudo mount -t cifs -o username=xxx,uid=1000,gid=100,iocharset=utf8,sec=ntlm //192.168.0.xxx/xxx /home/xxx/xxx It worked fine until the recent upgrade to kernel 4.13.3-1. Now the command returns an error: mount error(22): Invalid argument Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) I am convinced this is a bug of the kernel because when I boot on the lts kernel I can mount the samba share without problem. Downgrading the kernel also works. Additional info: * package version(s) : linux 4.13.3-1 * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: Boot with the kernel linux 4.13.3-1 and try to mount a samba share in console. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Saturday, 30 September 2017, 12:11 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Saturday, 30 September 2017, 12:11 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Comment by loqs (loqs) -
Friday, 29 September 2017, 17:11 GMT
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=230324 ?
Comment by hopimet (hopimet) -
Friday, 29 September 2017, 17:38 GMT
Thanks a lot. I didn't see this information. vers=2.1 works fine.