Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#5547 - x264 two-pass encoding bug
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jack Hollingworth (bralkein) - Saturday, 07 October 2006, 23:11 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Tuesday, 05 December 2006, 10:27 GMT
Opened by Jack Hollingworth (bralkein) - Saturday, 07 October 2006, 23:11 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Tuesday, 05 December 2006, 10:27 GMT
|
DetailsThe x264 package fails to handle two-pass encoding properly. The first pass will generate what seems to be an invalid stats file, which is then rejected by the second pass. I only had time to test this with a couple of files, but upgrading to the 07-10-2006 snapshot seemed to solve the problem. The stats files generated by the newer version were larger by 7-10MB, so the difference between the way the versions handles this is clearly significant - which is a strong suggestion that updating to a newer snapshot is appropriate.
Since all that is required is the changing of the snapshot date in the PKGBUILD, it is very easy to update the package. It's been quite a long time, so IMO that's what should be done. I didn't just want to flag the package out of date though, since the meaning is unclear with development snapshots. |
This task depends upon