Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#55219 - [rfc] checksum mismatch

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Erich Eckner (deepthought) - Monday, 21 August 2017, 09:14 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Thursday, 21 June 2018, 17:14 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:

The checksums do not match:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
rfc-index-20170817.txt ... FAILED
license ... Passed
RFCs0001-0500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs0501-1000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs1001-1500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs1501-2000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs2001-2500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs2501-3000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs3001-3500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs3501-4000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs4001-4500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs4501-5000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs5001-5500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs5501-6000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs6001-6500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs6501-7000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs7001-7500.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs7501-8000.tar.gz ... FAILED
RFCs8001-latest.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Additional info:
* package version(s)
rfc-20170817-1

Steps to reproduce:
Try to build it.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Thursday, 21 June 2018, 17:14 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Monday, 21 August 2017, 14:40 GMT
Hmm,  FS#53289  argues for reworking the source files entirely, partially on the grounds that it can and does change.

Loading...