FS#55156 - [lua51-bitop] [lua52-bitop] missing license

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Gustavo Alvarez (sl1pkn07) - Tuesday, 15 August 2017, 17:55 GMT
Last edited by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Sunday, 03 September 2017, 03:57 GMT
Task Type General Gripe
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto)
Architecture All
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No
This task depends upon

Closed by  Eli Schwartz (eschwartz)
Sunday, 03 September 2017, 03:57 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  lua-bitop 1.0.2-8
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Tuesday, 15 August 2017, 18:40 GMT
  • Field changed: Task Type (Bug Report → General Gripe)
  • Field changed: Summary ([lua{51,52}-bitop] missing license → [lua52-bitop] missing license)
  • Field changed: Status (Unconfirmed → Assigned)
  • Field changed: Severity (Low → Very Low)
  • Task assigned to Anatol Pomozov (anatolik), Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto)
The lua package is not a dependency of either of the lua{51,52}-bitop packages.

This appears to have been a copy-paste error here: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/lua-bitop&id=5b11219ef62a54d1080cf076b6799e7f9814930c

And that should be a symlink to lua52 instead of lua51
For lua52-bitop only.
Comment by Gustavo Alvarez (sl1pkn07) - Tuesday, 15 August 2017, 18:58 GMT
more than missing license, the file is named COPYRIGHT instead of LICENSE in the lua51-bitop
but in lua52-bitop, point to lua51 instead of lua52

└───╼ ls /usr/share/licenses/lua51-bitop/LICENSE
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 may 10 2015 /usr/share/licenses/lua51-bitop/LICENSE -> ../lua51/LICENSE <- in red
└───╼ ls /usr/share/licenses/lua51/LICENSE
ls: cannot access '/usr/share/licenses/lua51/LICENSE': No such file or directory
└───╼ ls /usr/share/licenses/lua51/COPYRIGHT
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1528 nov 6 2016 /usr/share/licenses/lua51/COPYRIGHT
└───╼ ls /usr/share/licenses/lua52-bitop/LICENSE
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 may 10 2015 /usr/share/licenses/lua52-bitop/LICENSE -> ../lua51/LICENSE <- in red
└───╼ ls /usr/share/licenses/lua52/LICENSE
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1523 nov 6 2016 /usr/share/licenses/lua52/LICENSE
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Tuesday, 15 August 2017, 19:02 GMT
  • Field changed: Summary ([lua52-bitop] missing license → [lua51-bitop] [lua52-bitop] missing license)
Hmm, that is a good point. I didn't think to double-check what the license name for lua51 was.
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Saturday, 02 September 2017, 20:34 GMT
Updated the package. Please confirm that the license files are now okay.
Comment by Gustavo Alvarez (sl1pkn07) - Sunday, 03 September 2017, 00:36 GMT
done. tnx

└───╼ ls ls /usr/share/licenses/lua51-bitop/LICENSE
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 sep 2 22:33 /usr/share/licenses/lua51-bitop/LICENSE -> ../lua51/COPYRIGHT
└───╼ ls /usr/share/licenses/lua52-bitop/LICENSE
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 sep 2 22:33 /usr/share/licenses/lua52-bitop/LICENSE -> ../lua52/LICENSE

Loading...