Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#55065 - [python-docs] checksum mismatch
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Erich Eckner (deepthought) - Monday, 07 August 2017, 17:36 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Thursday, 21 June 2018, 17:14 GMT
Opened by Erich Eckner (deepthought) - Monday, 07 August 2017, 17:36 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Thursday, 21 June 2018, 17:14 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
The checksum does not match: ... ==> Building in chroot for [staging] (x86_64)... ==> Synchronizing chroot copy [/var/lib/archbuild/staging-x86_64/root] -> [erich]...done ==> Making package: python-docs 3.6.2-1 (Mon Aug 7 19:35:57 CEST 2017) ==> Retrieving sources... -> Downloading python-3.6.2-docs-html.tar.bz2... % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 5845k 100 5845k 0 0 10.0M 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 10.0M ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... python-3.6.2-docs-html.tar.bz2 ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ==> ERROR: Could not download sources. Cheers, deep42thought |
This task depends upon
I understand, that this is tedious - maybe you can convince upstream to publish "reproducible" sources?